SEC rule challenged

The API and a coalition of concerned business groups have sued the SEC in US federal court challenging the SEC’s implementation of Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The suit claims that the SEC has disregarded its clear legal obligations to limit the costs and anti competitive harm of the rule.

Comments

‘The oil and gas industry strongly supports payment transparency,’ said API President and CEO Jack Gerard. ‘We’ve been working hard to increase transparency for a decade, but this rule could interfere with ongoing efforts by making US firms less competitive against state owned firms in China and Russia that have no interest in transparency.’

Gerard continued to say that the industry is working wit civil society groups and the Obama administration to implement the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). This is a program that would more effectively increase transparency without harming competitiveness. The initiative has already been established in 36 countries and is growing.

‘The rule as written would impose enormous costs on US firms and put them at a competitive disadvantage against government owned oil giants not subject to the rule,’ Gerard said. ‘Not only will the rule hurt the millions of Americans who own shares in oil and natural gas companies, it will also cost jobs and damage America’s energy security by making it more difficult for US firms to gain access to resources abroad.’

Under the SEC rule, publicly traded energy firms are required to release commercially sensitive, detailed payment information about foreign and US projects. Under this, firms would have to reveal extensive data about how much they pay in licenses, taxes, royalties and other fees. This would give competitors the upper hand when bidding for contracts. The SEC believe that developing and operating the systems to gather, validate and report this detailed information will cost the industry US$ 1 billion initially.

‘With reasonable changes, the SEC could have achieved the goal of increased transparency while also remaining faithful to its core mission to protect American investors,’ Gerard said. ‘The rule should allow our companies to report their payments confidentially to the SEC and allow the agency to aggregate that information and publicly report payments by country.’ Gerard also said that the rule should contain a reporting exception for payments to governments that prohibit disclosure.

The coalition

The coalition includes the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Foreign Trade Council and the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

Adapted from press release by Claira Lloyd.

Published on 11/10/2012


Oilfield Technology

Would you like a FREE issue of Oilfield Technology magazine?

With 12 issues per year containing strong technical editorial and exciting case studies, you’ll easily stay up-to-date on the technologies, solutions and services that see global upstream oil and gas operations flow smoothly and successfully.

Get your FREE magazine now »

No credit card required

 
 

Related articles

API: RFS problems abound, not least fraudulent RINs

Bob Greco from the API comments on the pros and cons of the US EPA’s RFS law, focusing particularly on the issue of fraudulent RINs.

API welcomes congressional action

The American Petroleum Institute has welcomed Congressional action to fix fraudulent renewable fuel credit program

API comment on the RVP waiver

The American Petroleum Institute comment on the Reid Vapor Pressure waiver decision. Saying it will help assure fuel supplies in hurricane states.

Write your own comments

*
*
*

Recommend magazines

  Hydrocarbon Engineering