PennEast project opposed by public

PennEast’s plans to build a 108 mile long and US$1.2 billion natural gas pipeline could be in jeopardy.

The pipeline would transport natural gas from the Marcellus Shale, Pennsylvania, terminating on the outskirts of Trenton.

Dr. Tullis Onstott, Professor of Geosciences at Princeton University took stand and swore: "the proposed pipeline route crosses every aquifer recharge zone that provides drinking water to local communities, and every wetland that discharges water into the Delaware Raritan Canal.”

The potential limitation of clean drinking water would be a consequence of the pipeline construction, in addition to the loss of property values and being unable the protect the environment.

While peoples oppose and debate the pipeline project, PennEast plans to submit its application to FERC in September.

Edited from various sources NJ and Huffington Post by Stephanie Roker

Published on 19/08/2015


Get your FREE Oilfield Technology magazine »

Get your FREE trial of Hydrocarbon Engineering magazine »

Get your FREE trial of World Pipelines magazine »


 
 

Related articles

Energyzt reports on New England’s winter reliability

Report on New England energy winter reliability solutions finds proposed subsidised natural gas pipeline to be unnecessary and costly.

Energy East pipeline concerns

The Ontario Energy Board has deduced that Energy East’s pipeline project will be detrimental to environment, more so than any potential benefits.

Park says pipeline proposal poses threat to cave’s resources

The National Park Service worries over Kinder Morgan’s ageing natural gas pipeline and the risks for the parks ecological systems.

PennEast Pipeline could save consumers nearly US$1 billion annually

Concentric Advisors’ analysis estimates consumer savings of more than US$890 million had PennEast Pipeline’s capacity been available last winter.

Recommend magazines

  World Pipelines