Sandpiper pipeline update: February 2015

Route talk

Regardless of environmental feasibility, the Sandpiper pipeline project might not happen if the originally proposed route is not followed.

Paul Eberth, Sandpiper’s Project Manager, testified last month at an evidentiary hearing for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission that the North Dakota Pipeline Company, a subsidiary of Enbridge, may scrap their application for the roughly 616 mile pipeline if it doesn’t follow what the company deems as critical factors in the application - a pipeline that stretches from near Tioga, N.D., to Clearbrook, Minnesota, and on to Superior, Wisconsin.

Eberth was asked if a pipeline built along one of the eight proposed “system alternatives” - routes proposed by entities other than NDPC, most of which do not pass through Clearbrook or Superior - could benefit the local economies of towns near the route. He agreed towns along system alternative routes would benefit financially from having a pipeline near them, but said he doesn’t think any pipeline outside of Enbridge’s preferred route would actually be built.

“I personally don’t think those benefits would be realised because there isn’t economic support for the system alternatives,” Eberth said.

“The system alternatives proposed by others are fundamentally different projects,” Eberth said after Tuesday’s session. “Connections at Clearbrook and Superior are the underpinnings of our contracts with shippers and our approved Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rate structure. There is no commercial support for the system alternatives.”

That particular route gives Enbridge a high degree of interconnectivity to existing terminals and pipelines. Oil could be sent from the Clearbrook terminal to Twin Cities refineries, while Bakken crude sent to Sandpiper’s proposed terminus could be sent south to refineries in Illinois. Routes that do not hit those two terminals give Enbridge’s clients, the oil companies shipping the crude oil from the Bakken, fewer options on where to refine their product, Eberth said.

Threatened bat species

A bat that may soon be added to the Endangered Species List could interrupt plans for the pipeline.

The potential pipeline would run 150 miles through the habitat of the northern long-eared bat, which has been decimated by white nose syndrome. Federal officials are about to determine whether it should be listed as threatened or endangered, after a series of meetings and public-comment periods last autumn. Their deadline is 2 April.


Edited from various sources by Elizabeth Corner

Sources: Prairie BusinessPopular Science

Published on 19/02/2015


Get your FREE Oilfield Technology magazine »

Get your FREE trial of Hydrocarbon Engineering magazine »

Get your FREE trial of World Pipelines magazine »


 
 

Related articles

Hearings begin for Sandpiper pipeline

Enbridge’s Sandpiper pipeline hearings begin in Minnesota

Marathon commits to Sandpiper Project

Marathon Petroleum Corporation to partner Enbridge Energy Partners' Sandpiper pipeline.

Enbridge plans a US$ 2.5 billion oil pipeline across northern Minnesota

Enbridge will file applications this week to build a US$ 2.5 billion oil pipeline across northern Minnesota.

Recommend magazines

  Hydrocarbon Engineering  World Pipelines