Skip to main content

Is floating offshore wind too big to start?

Published by , Editor
Energy Global,


The UK government promised 43 – 50 GW of offshore wind by 2030, with 5 GW coming from floating offshore wind. However, without more leases, infrastructure, or investor confidence, the country’s floating wind ambitions could sink, says Theo Cleave, Commercial Manager at MintMech.

The UK has committed to a 100% carbon-free electricity system by 2035 and net zero by 2050. The majority of the country’s green electricity is expected to come from wind power by 2030. With some of the world’s best offshore wind resources, most of that will come from offshore installations.

Fixed-bottom offshore wind farms continue to provide a significant share of renewable electricity. But, according to the Energy Technology Institute (ETI), the UK has many high-energy offshore wind sites beyond the depth where current fixed-bottom technology is viable. This is where floating offshore wind comes in.

According to Stuart Bradley, Strategy Manager – Offshore Renewables at the ETI, in water depths less than 30 m, fixed foundations will be the prime solution, but in water depths over 50 m, floating foundations provide the lowest cost solution. A mix of these technologies is likely to offer the lowest cost pathway to deliver large scale deployment in the UK.

A paper from the University of Oxford Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment suggests that ultimately, floating offshore wind could provide the UK with over 2000 TWh/y, which is more than the entire country’s 1500 TWh predicted 2050 annual electricity consumption.

There are additional benefits to floating offshore wind which give it real potential. Aside from providing access to deeper water, floating offshore wind farms could be cheaper and faster to install, contain less embodied carbon as steel and offer quicker, more cost-effective decommissioning at the end of a contract.

Floating offshore wind is technically sound and offers logistic advantages – everyone appears to agree that it is going ahead, and the Celtic Sea looks ideal – but as it stands, there is no real forward momentum. In April 2025, bidders were still waiting for leases for three sites in the Celtic Sea. With less than five years to go before the 2030 deadline, only a handful of pilot floating offshore wind schemes exist.

No chain, no gain

Without a committed pipeline of projects, it seems that investors are sceptical about investing in the necessary infrastructure and supply chains to make floating offshore wind happen. For example, there would be a huge demand for quayside space, anchor chains, and fabrication dockyards – but it is a gamble to build them on the chance that floating offshore wind overtakes fixed-bottom as the UK’s principal source of offshore wind energy.

According to a 2024 report by the Government-Industry Floating Offshore Wind Taskforce, floating offshore wind could employ 97 000 people and contribute £47 billion to the economy by 2050. But if you asked me today to give you 50 floating wind turbines, I’d be more likely to turn to places like the Netherlands or Germany, which are miles ahead in terms of infrastructure and supply chains.

Manufacturing, assembling, and installing floating offshore wind turbines is one thing, but they still need plugging in. There would still be a need to construct substations, install cables, and develop onshore infrastructure to receive the generated power, which would often involve work like directional drilling in highly tidal areas like the Celtic Sea. This could be in South Wales or in the Southwest – and wherever the power goes ashore will see a big industrial benefit – but virtually none of this infrastructure exists yet.

Developer engagement

Perhaps the clearest contrast between floating and fixed-bottom offshore wind is the behaviour of the developers. For example, there have been events (such as those led by RWE) related to expanding a fixed bottom installation in North Wales where about 50 staff were stationed at topic-specific tables. Attendees could choose to speak on topics like semisubs, O&M, anchoring solutions, whatever their area of expertise. They were encouraged to explain their role in the supply chain and essentially pitch their services. It was direct engagement with the people who were delivering the wind farm, the ones signing the cheques.

With floating wind however, engagement like this appears absent. Without contracts or even lease awards, what are suppliers supposed to do? Few look willing to build new facilities or hire staff on the hope of future demand.

The role of government

If the private sector will not make the first move, floating offshore wind feels like the perfect proving ground for Great British Energy (GBE). By breaking the stalemate with leases, guarantees or seed capital for UK-based fabrication, a public entity like GBE could make a real difference. This is the kind of high risk, high impact move that gives GBE an opportunity to make a name for itself.

Pledges and strategy documents are one thing, but until there’s a major player saying, “we want an established floating wind design by this date, come to our conference, talk to our teams, we’re taking ten concepts forward”, it is hard to see the industry acting.

The UK has some of the best offshore wind resources on the planet and the country is already a global leader in fixed bottom resources. Perhaps the same can be true for floating offshore wind. The expertise exists, the geography is ideal, and the ambition has been stated. Now the question is whether anyone is ready to anchor that ambition to action.

 

 

For more news and technical articles from the global renewable industry, read the latest issue of Energy Global magazine.

Energy Global's Summer 2025 issue

Dive into the latest renewable energy insights in the Summer issue of Energy Global, out now! This edition features a guest comment from Change Rebellion on the role real change management can play in the global energy sector before a regional report, which looks at energy trends and transformations across the Americas. Other key topics are also explored, including offshore support vessels, floating wind, weather analysis, and battery storage. Contributors include Ørsted, CRC Evans, Miros, Solcast, and more, so don’t miss out!

Read the article online at: https://www.energyglobal.com/special-reports/24072025/is-floating-offshore-wind-too-big-to-start/

You might also like

 
 

Embed article link: (copy the HTML code below):